NEWS

How to assemble a solid state battery mold?   1. For Reference Only Maximum Compressive Capacity: 5T (5 metric tons). Internal Sleeve Material: ZrO2 (Zirconia) or PEEK (Polyether ether ketone). Internal Die and Insulating Sheet Material: PPS (Polyphenylene sulfide). Upper and Lower Electrode Rod Material: 4Cr13 Mold Steel. External Fixture Material: SUS304 Stainless Steel. Electrode Rod Surface Finish: Mirror-polished. Other Processes: Including but not limited to quenching, cryogenic treatment, chamfering, etc. Internal Sleeve Diameter: 10 mm (other specifications customizable). Internal Die Dimensions: Φ44*88mm. External Fixture Dimensions: Φ88*129mm.   2. Structural Component Description   3. Mold battery assembly (inside the glove box) Assembly & Operation Instructions A: Place the ceramic sleeve into

                                                  Neware was founded in 1998. We are trusted by ATL, BYD, CATL, Tesla, Apple, HUAWEI, SolarEdge, etc. We provide battery testing solutions for testing battery cell, module, pack, supercapacitor, BESS, etc. If you want to do capacity, cycle life, pulse, DCIR, GITT, HPPC, or EV driving simulation test, please feel free to contact us.   More: How to assemble and test a three electrode pouch cell? How to set Shuttle Current Test on Neware BTS for lithium-sulfur batteries? 2026 update How to set up PITT

How to assemble and test a three electrode pouch cell? The Role of Three-Electrode Systems in Battery Analysis When a battery undergoes low-temperature or high-rate charging, lithium ions reaching the anode may fail to intercalate into the graphite layers in time, leading to lithium plating. This is a polarization phenomenon caused by kinetic limitations. Therefore, to better investigate various electrochemical properties, a reference electrode is often introduced. This allows for the independent measurement of the cathode and anode potentials relative to the reference, as well as their potential variations under different testing conditions. By utilizing a three-electrode system, researchers can perform comprehensive, in-situ analysis on several fronts: the film-forming reactions

Graphite Anodes Explained: Chemical vs. Electrochemical Lithiation in Lithium-Ion Batteries Source: WeChat Official Account “Brother Radish” 萝卜大师兄 Graphite anode materials have maintained a dominant position in the lithium-ion battery industry since their discovery. While cathode options have diversified significantly—ranging from Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) and Lithium Cobalt Oxide (LCO) to NCM Ternary cathodes—graphite remains the undisputed first choice for the anode. But why is this the case? Join us as we trace the developmental history of the graphite anode and explore how it established its long-standing “dynasty” in the battery world. I. The Discovery of Chemical Lithiation in Graphite (1950s) In 1955, the French chemist A. Hérold immersed graphite into

NEWARE Mini All in One Battery Testing System WHW-25L+15C-5V100mA-16CH spec     WHW-25L+15C-5V100mA-32CH spec       Neware was founded in 1998. We are trusted by ATL, BYD, CATL, Tesla, Apple, HUAWEI, SolarEdge, etc. We provide battery testing solutions for testing battery cell, module, pack, supercapacitor, BESS, etc. If you want to do capacity, cycle life, pulse, DCIR, GITT, HPPC, or EV driving simulation test, please feel free to contact us.

Impact of Testing Fixtures on the Cycle Performance of LFP Batteries Cycle performance is a fundamental metric for evaluating the service life of lithium-ion batteries. It is influenced by a wide range of factors, including material properties, cell structure, moisture content, and manufacturing processes. Furthermore, external parameters such as temperature, cycling protocols, and mechanical pressure also significantly impact the cycle performance of lithium-ion batteries. To investigate the effect of testing fixture constraints on cycle performance and to enhance the reliability of pouch cell testing during the system optimization phase, this study focuses on a 3.65 Ah LiFePO4 (LFP)/graphite pouch cell. Two types of testing fixtures were evaluated: non-constrained fixtures, utilizing